Friday, October 8, 2010
Need to Know How to Steal and Invention and Commit Patent Fraud?
You Need a Corrupt Patent Attorney like Kenneth Rubenstein - MPEG LA Patent Attorney of the Corrupt Proskauer Rose Law Firm.
You Need someone CORRUPT like MPEG LA to pool your technology with other patents so know one knows you invented it.
And well.. Here is More..
Click Here - Patent Theft, Fraud on the US Patent Office, Postal Fraud, Business and Commerce Fraud
Criminals in iViewit Scandal
Chris Wheeler
Brian G. Utley
Raymond Joao
Kenneth Rubenstein
Douglas Boehm
William Dick
Steven Becker
R3D
Gerald Stanley
Crossbow Ventures
Ryan Huiseman
Raymond Hersch
more on the Massive Shareholder Fraud over Iviewit Technologies
at www.DeniedPatent.com and www.Iviewit.TV
Thursday, October 7, 2010
Need to Know How to Steal and Invention and Commit Patent Fraud?
You Need a Corrupt Patent Attorney like Kenneth Rubenstein - MPEG LA Patent Attorney of the Corrupt Proskauer Rose Law Firm.
You Need someone CORRUPT like MPEG LA to pool your technology with other patents so know one knows you invented it.
And well.. Here is More..
Click Here - Patent Theft, Fraud on the US Patent Office, Postal Fraud, Business and Commerce Fraud
Criminals in iViewit Scandal
Chris Wheeler
Brian G. Utley
Raymond Joao
Kenneth Rubenstein
Douglas Boehm
William Dick
Steven Becker
R3D
Gerald Stanley
Crossbow Ventures
Ryan Huiseman
Raymond Hersch
more on the Massive Shareholder Fraud over Iviewit Technologies
at www.DeniedPatent.com and www.Iviewit.TV
Thursday, February 11, 2010
Iviewit Stolen Patent Case - Need to Know More about Iviewit Technologies and Who has the authority to do What?
Click Here for Document
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
Is Stephen Lamont, Former Alleged CEO, of Iviewit Conspiring with Foley and Lardner, the USPTO and other Players in the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case ???
I Could not Figure out what possible Motive Stephen Lamont could have to Attempt to Discredit My Blog Postings and to Discredit Eliot Bernstein, when the Information on the Web from those two sources would only benefit P. Stephen Lamont up until he Threatened Me.
I just could not understand why Stephen Lamont would DEMAND that I remove Posts with his name, when those Posts were information from the www.Iviewit.TV Website that he links to in his every email, seemingly. and in which he seems to promote on the Internet with his my Space page and other online outlets of promotion.
So Why in the World would Stephen Lamont Threaten Me and Tell me to get My Affairs in order while I still can.. ?? and demand that I change my Blogs.. ?? when the Facts of the Story came from www.Iviewit.TV in which he promotes ?
It Simply Did not Make Sense to me.
In trying to figure out Why P. Stephen Lamont is Aggressively Demanding and Threatening me Now after 2 months of Blogging about the Iviewit Stolen Patent, and after the information has seemingly been on the Internet for over 8 years... I just had to Look Deeper...
I found myself needing to know more, and asking myself who is Stephen Lamont working with, why NOW?, what changed?
Did someone contact him and tell him to play big shot CEO and try and scare me with Demanding and Threatening Emails?
Did Stephen Lamont get orders from the USPTO - Foley and Lardner or some other Play in the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case?
P. Stephen Lamont is obviously a very smart man and surely saw me covering this story for around 2 months so far. Right ?
A guy who claims he wants to take over video.. blah .. blah .. blah.. online and the world this and that.. Surely he saw my Blogs, surely he looked into who and what I am about.. and Surely Stephen Lamont did not all of the Sudden wake up to my Righteous Stance on the Behalf of the Iviewit Shareholders, and the Iviewit Inventors ... On February 4th 2010, The day he was in Such a Stir about the email that Eliot Bernstein Sent out.
So Why did Stephen Lamont launch Demands and Threats on Crystal L. Cox, Investigative Blogger - when I was and have been for two months... out to Defend HIM, the company he was supposedly CEO of, and him getting his rightful compensation for the Iviewit Shares in which he deserves, Along with the Inventors and other Shareholders of the Iviewit Technologies Inc. ????
It seems to me that Stephen Lamont is running a Bluff at me, possibly for Someone Else. It Seems to Me that P. Stephen Lamont wants this "Hillbilly Blogger" to believe he has powers that he does not have in a Company which he is no longer a part of other then being a Shareholder as many other Shareholders....
Kind of makes you wonder who P. Stephen Lamont is Really Working for... could it be one of the Billionaire Tech Companies - Billionaire Law Firms or ?
I mean if the Tech companies can afford Millions on Top of Millions - in Anti-Trust Violation fines every year, often every Quarter and the Law Firms such as Proskauer Rose can pay 1.5 million as a minimum a month in rent in once location and they are Global..
These Companies involved in this Trillion Dollar Stolen patent.. they have some serious money.. why not use some of it to try and Run a Bluff on some Woman.. by sending in someone with a big Fancy CEO Title of the Company your Talking about to discredit the very people you have been defending for 2 months so far.. Why not Send in someone I may think is the CEO - or somehow I may think is in Charge of the Iviewit Company?
Surely this will Shut me UP.. Right?
and If that don't Work well Stephen Lamont
will just Threat to End my Affairs...
So Again Why NOW.. ???
this information on my Investigative Blogs
is Public Knowledge, it is in the Courts, in the News,
and all over the www.Iviewit.TV website.. so why now?
Why Me?
Maybe, Possibly, Just speculating here .. maybe the Super Power Elite told P. Stephen Lamont that the Iviewit Inventors would NEVER get their rights and the SHAREHOLDERS will never get paid, however maybe he could get something out of the deal.. just speculating here..
Maybe .. just maybe someone offered P. Stephen Lamont Money to work on the other side and make it look like he was working for the best interest of the Iviewit Shareholders and the REAL Iviewit Inventors.
But anyone with a brain can see that currently Eliot Bernstein and P. Stephen Lamont are not quite on the same page, so why would I think that P. Stephen Lamont could speak for Eliot Bernstein or the Iviewit Technologies Company.
If P. Stephen Lamont is disputing the information I posted, and that in which contains his name then why does every email to every person he emails and his resume, and his My Space Page contain the www.Iviewit.TV website ... as if it is his site, he is proud of it and Well ... Gee.. Hmmm... I got the information from that site and linked to the source...
So What is Really Going on with P. Stephen Lamont? Who is P. Stephen Lamont Talking to and on Whose Authority his he Demanding anything of me?
Well I can Tell you that Right After I posted this post.
http://www.industrywhistleblower.com/
2010/02/p-stephen-lamont-friend-or-foe-of_05.html
A Story of Intrigue and Suspense Unfolded Before my Eyes.. and Not Just the Threats and Demands from P. Stephen Lamont, but also of Who he Told, where they were and What Connections and Fingerprints he left along the way..
Well .. My Stat Counter Told me a Story .. that I feel I must Share..
I feel from My Own Personal Experience in Analyzing my Stats over the Years, and in my Opinion that once P. Stephen Lamont Seen the Above Post... he then Contacted the USPTO, Foley and Lardner, Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe, Duval & Stachenfeld, Steven C. Becker and
"Crystal L. Cox" Lamont
Well Click Here and Read the Story...
posted by Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
More information on the Trillion Dollar Iviewit Stolen Patent
at www.DeniedPatent.com and at www.Iviewit.TV
Lamont Iviewit
Crystal L. Cox
Crystal Cox
Sunday, February 7, 2010
Shocking Turn - Former Iviewit Technologies CEO,P. Stephen Lamont Tells Investigative Blogger - Whistleblower- Crystal L. Cox to Get Affairs in Order.
the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case involves Major, Big Money Law Firms connected to the Wealthiest Corporations in the World Such as Foley and Lardner LLP, Proskuaer Rose LLP, Greenberg Traurig, and more ....
Also in the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case We have Major CEO's, High Powered General Counsel's of Major Corporations, HUGE Medial Relations and PR companies and well the Biggest of the Big in Finance, News, Investments, Tech Companies, Politics and Law Firms.
None whom have emailed or Threatened me
in any way thus far into my Iviewit Stolen Patent Writings.
Blog
or Threatened me in any way.
So you can Imagine my Complete Surprise when an Iviewit Insider Called my Home, left no message and sent me an email that I deem as a Death Threat.
It may not seem that way to you but it sure feels that way to me.
iviewit
Stephen Lamont Emails ME
Up until a few days ago I thought that P. Stephen Lamont was on the side of getting the Shareholders their rightful money and getting the Inventors the Rights to their Patent, another words ... Up Until a Few Days ago I thought P. Stephen Lamont was on the
Right Side of the Law, and the Right Side of the Moral Compass.
However, Now I am seriously confused as to what
P. Stephen Lamont's motive's are.
iviewit
the Iviewit company invested Millions upon Millions, as did the SBA and Related banks such as Wachovia, as well as investors like Ellen Degeneres and tons more who are iviewit Shareholders denied of their rights, their money seemingly Stolen by a Corrupt Patent Office, Court Corruption, and Attorneys Covering Up Each others Lies and Illegal Behavoir.
So why would a Former CEO be causing such a Stir ?
And Why Now ?
iviewit patent case
Why would a Formor Iviewit Technologies CEO Demand that I include him in all correspondence on the iViewit Company and Include him on ANY and ALL correspondence with the Owner of the iViewit Company - and one of the Inventors of the iViewit Technology?
Does a Former CEO have a Right to Make such Requests?
Ok well here is Today's Email.. of Which It Sounds to Me Like I had Better Get My Affairs in Order While I still can, According to P. Stephen Lamont.
************
Crystal Cox Blogger
Stephen Lamont Phoned My Home Last Night
He Left No Message, Today He Sent me
This Threatening Email
from lamont
" Ms. Cox:
I understand you have transmitted an email, which I have not received.
As I indicate below, continue your investigation, and if you come up with even one incidence where I have caused harm to Iviewit shareholders in our quest to own the video and imaging world then we can begin a dialogue.
Until then, however, you have been put on notice to remove my name from your various blog sites, and I will expect you will govern your affairs accordingly, while you still have some affairs to govern, that is.
Best regards,
P. Stephen Lamont
Chief Executive Officer
Iviewit Technologies, Inc.
175 King Street
Armonk, N.Y. 10504
Tel: 914-217-0038
Email: pstephen.lamont@verizon.net; pstephen.lamont@att.blackberry.net
URL: www.linkedin.com/in/pstephenlamont; www.myspace.com/pstephenlamont; http://www.iviewit.tv/ "
I know many of you wonder Why don't I tell the FBI, however the FBI does not Care, I have told them of Criminal Activity before and they don't bother to respond, or look into it and seem to have local law in the area of the Crime simple make the Criminal Look like the Good Guy.
crystal l. cox
I can only suspect that the FBI themselves are controlled just as all the Other High Courts, Judges, Huge Law Firms, Patent Office, Supreme Court and others that are Keeping this Trillion Dollar Patent Theft a Secret from Shareholders, Investors and Refusing to Give the Inventors the Rights to what they invented, Though This Big Boys having been using the Technology for Years upon Years...
Crystal Cox Blog
In the email above from P. Stephen Lamont to Crystal L. Cox, The part about an email that I have Transmitted and he has not received, that is so cryptic and kind of funny - I have no idea what it means as I have sent tons of emails in which he has not received - for they were not to him. I have no idea what he is Talking About.
Crystal L Cox
He talks about my "investigation" what does that mean?
blog
I am pretty much an investigative journalist, I research and I post, I am not conducting some sort of Official "investigation" and again have no idea what P. Stephen Lamont is Getting At here.
Crystal L. Cox
In my opinion, from my research, I don't understand how P. Stephen Lamont thinks he is any part of owning the video and imaging world, he WAS a CEO, he is a Shareholder.. that's it.
crystal l cox
I mean if your hired on as a CEO does that mean you own, run and control a Company?
crystal cox
Can a Former CEO go Seemingly Rogue and initiate Legal Complaints, and make Demands on behalf of a Company he is no longer affiliated with other then owning shares?
Iviewit Stolen Patent Case
If so, then all the iViewit Shareholders would seemingly have that same right.
Stolen Patent
It just does not Make Sense.
Iviewit
P. Stephen Lamont Now Phoning me and Sending me Cryptic, Threatening Emails after 2 months of writing on the Iviewit Stolen Patent, well, I just don't understand it.
Crystal Cox
Surely a Smart man like P. Stephen Lamont
Seen My Sites before Feb. 4th.
Patent
SO What Changed, Why Now ?
Crystal L. Cox
If you have any information on the Motives of P. Stephen Lamont,
please email our Whistle blower Hot line at Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Posted by Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
More on the Iviewit Technology
Stolen Patent Case at www.DeniedPatent.com
and www.iViewit.TV
crystal l cox
Wednesday, January 27, 2010
Do you think that this Foley and Lardner Rumor is True?
What Do you Think? Is there any Truth to this.. is Foley and Lardner Connected to the RNC .. oh yeah there is the Michael Grebe thing.. so What Do you Folks Know.. Email me at Crystal@CrystalCox.com - I am YOUR Investigative Blogger.
Crystal L. Cox..
Wherever there is Patent Theft, there Seems to Be Foley and Lardner
It is hard to understand how the US Court System, the US Patent Office and the Attorney Bar has looked away for so long. How does Foley and Lardner stay ahead of the Law, ahead of Accountability and avoid Criminal Prosecution for what they have done to Inventors?
Foley and Lardner having had a Connection in the Republican National Committee Seem to have the Power to Make Patent Theft part of their Standard Business Activity, and seemingly have come to expect that they can get away with it and the Inventors will NEVER be heard. And are just Collaterall Damage to make Foley and Lardner's World Better
It is understandable to Expect that your "Counsel" would Protect your Best Interest, However Foley And Lardner did just the Opposite and was involved in the Iviewit Stolen Patent. And this was year after they had already been EXPOSED for Patent Theft involvement and the Courts Ignored the Inventors Rights, giving Foley and Lardner the Power to continue their Patent Theft, Civil Rights Violation Reign of Terror.
Michael Grebe was head of Foley and Lardner when they became involved acting counsel for the Iviewit Intellectual Property Filings.
Michael Grebe was Chairman and CEO of Foley and Lardner and was partner for 25 years. And then Michael Grebe Goes on to Counsel the RNC, Became President and CEO of the Bradley Foundation - Michael Grebe and The Bradley Foundation are some of the biggest backers of the Bush / Cheney / Rumsfeld Administration.
Michael Grebe, through the Bradley Foundation funds Charles Murray to write more about how blacks are inferior to whites like in his book, The Bell Curve..
Michael Grebe seems to me to be so powerfully connected that anyone at Foley and Lardner would be Protected to Pretty Much Do anything they please and simply know that the RIGHT people would be in Right Places to Protect Their Actions, no matter how illegal or immoral those actions might be.
We Can See from the Link Below that Foley and Lardner has been Connected to Patent Theft for quite some time. The question then becomes is Patent Theft so lucrative that it is affecting the Political Process, the Administration and has a Role in or influence over Big Government?
If Michael Grebe was Head of Foley and Lardner and these things were going on, How much did he know? What did he condone or allow and How Much was he involved in this Patent Theft Business that Foley and Larder seemed to be in?
Michael Grebe had to know of the Patent Thefts and not just their involvement in the Trillion Dollar Iviewit Patent Theft but in Patent Thefts, and Inventor Harassment and Criminal Activity for Many Years Prior... Such as the David Stone Invention Stolen...
"" Oct. 15,1993 Gilbert, Mark Sapperstein, Longo, Procter and Robert WarfIeld Sr. acting in
concert with the three law firms Miles & Stockbridge, Foley & Lardner and Williams
Hammond, Shockley, Moore & Harrison seize control of DSII and threaten to have Stone
arrested on unspecified criminal charges if Stone doesn't capitulate to their extortion attempt.""
Big Law Firms, Politicians, Big Money, HUGE Corporations SHOULD not be above the Laws of the United States of America and SHOULD not be above basic rights and human dignity.
political corruption
Monday, January 25, 2010
Michael Grebe was head of Foley and Lardner when they became involved acting counsel for the Iviewit intellectual property filings.
and the Iviewit Technologies Stolen Patent Case.
""If Patentgate pans out, as described at the www.iviewit.tv website, Michael Grebe would stand to lose any of his wealth accumulated at Foley and Lardner since 1998 and perhaps everything in a sucessful RICO and could become entangled in the criminal allegations currently under investigation by the FBI, the USPTO, the USPTO OED and international investigations that are ongoing.
Key intellectual properties of Iviewit handled by Foley and Lardner are under investigation as to how the wrong inventors, owners and assignees were falsified to the USPTO, violations of federal laws regarding on false oath submitted to the USPTO on IP applications. The Commissioner of Patents has suspended Iviewit IP pending investigations.
Similar allegations are under investigation in Europe through the EPI and through the European Patent Office and through the Patent Cooperation Treaty, these false and fraudulent applications could trigger an international investigation by over twenty countries were the papers were tendered.
Michael Grebe, remained the Chairman of RNC until 2001 and resigned after the potentially fraudulent election of George W. Bush and subsequent illegal appointment of a Supreme Court US President by a narrow 5-4 vote.
Michael Grebe at the time is cited as the largest force behind getting Bush appointed.
Patentgate is founded on the assumption that top down control of the government was siezed by the law firms involved in the thefts of the Iviewit patents, including Foley and Lardner, to prevent due process and procedure after they were caught with evidence and witnesses against their firms.
Recently the stakes went skyrocketing on the Iviewit matters with the attempted murder via a massive car bombing of inventor Eliot Bernstein in Boynton Beach Florida, a blast so powerful it blew up three cars alongside it.
Images at the www.iviewit.tv website The Iviewit matters have recently come before the House Judiciary Committee after being forwarded by John Dingell of the House Energy and Commerce Committee for investigation."
Patentgate is founded on the assumption that top down control of the government was siezed by the law firms involved in the thefts of the Iviewit patents, including Foley and Lardner, to prevent due process and procedure after they were caught with evidence and witnesses against their firms.
Recently the stakes went skyrocketing on the Iviewit matters with the attempted murder via a massive car bombing of inventor Eliot Bernstein in Boynton Beach Florida, a blast so powerful it blew up three cars alongside it. Images at the www.iviewit.tv website
Source of this Post.
http://www.politicalfriendster.com/
rateConnection.php?id1=697&id2=5255
Tuesday, January 19, 2010
Raymond Joao Opposition in STOLEN Iviewit Patent Case - Raymond A. Joao, Esq., Pro Se
It seems that Raymond A. Joao is Raymond A. Joao, Esq., Pro Se. So who is Representing Raymond Anthony Joao on that AT&T Patent Infringement Lawsuits he has Launched?
Raymond A. Joao, Esq., Pro Se ?
Where is John Walter Fried Esq. and Fried and Epstein?
Click Here for Raymond Joao Opposition in Iviewit Case
Eliot Bernstein, Iviewit Patent Theft, iViewIt Technologies, Joao Opposition Iviewit, John Walter Fried Esq., Patent Attorney Corruption, Raymond A. Joao