Intel Executives Make Decisions that Shareholders Take the Hit On? Looks like a RICO Pattern and History to ME. Massive Shareholder Liability Alert.

Funny Intel Shareholders don't even Know what CEO Paul Otellini is hiding from them and has been for many - MANY years on the Biggest Liability that Intel Corp. has ever seen.

Way before the Legal Issues with Advanced Micro Devices, and Billions in Fines .. there was and Still is the Trillion Dollar Liability of the Iviewit Technologies Company and the Stolen Technology that has made Billions on top of Billions and still is for Intel Corp. and many others involved in this High Finance Liability that shareholders will one day soon be FORCED to looked at AND that will be a Very Jagged Pill to Swallow.

November 2009 Article - Charles A. Gilman Got Moxy and Charles Gilman is VERY right in this request, Intel Executives are not Playing fair and NOT disclosing KNOWN Liabilities to this Day.

It is NOT the Intel Shareholder's Fault, they were no part of the Decisions and SHOULD not take the Financial Hit for It.

"" Intel shareholder wants execs to pay $2.7B in fines

He doesn't want the company on the hook for antitrust fines, settlement
By Sharon Gaudin.

Computerworld -

An Intel Corp. investor, frustrated that the chip maker has been hit with $2.7 billion in fines and settlement payments, has filed suit in U.S. District Court in Delaware against the company and its top executives.

Charles A. Gilman wants the court to force company executives, including Intel President and CEO Paul Otellini, to fork over money for the fines and payments so shareholders don't take a financial hit.

The lawsuit was filed the same week Intel reached a settlement with Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (AMD) to end all antitrust litigation between the two companies. As part of the deal, Intel agreed to pay rival AMD $1.25 billion.

That followed a ruling in May by the European Commission in which Intel was found guilty of antitrust violations in the market for PC microprocessors and fined it $1.44 billion.

Gilman, who refers to himself in court documents as a "long-time shareholder," doesn't think the company and its shareholders should suffer for Intel's actions.

In a document filed in court, Gilman's attorneys contend that shareholder attempts to influence Intel's board of directors have "proved fruitless. ...Indeed, shareholder demands have been met with outright hostility, which can only bespeak bad faith."

The document also contends that Intel's board refused to investigate the antitrust charges against the company or to appoint an independent committee to review the charges and take remedial action, if needed.

" The antagonism of Intel's Board of Directors to the shareholders' demand is readily explained by growing evidence that the antitrust scheme, which spanned three continents, and which has so far led to over $1 billion in fines, was personally directed by CEO Otellini and by Intel's former board chairman, Craig R. Barrett," the document alleges.

Ezra Gottheil, an analyst with Technology Business Research, Inc., said he's not surprised by the suit. "Someone always sues," he said, adding that he's never heard of company executives being forced to pay for any fines or settlements.

One of Gilman's attorneys, Roy Jacobs, of the firm Law Offices of Roy Jacobs in Manhattan, declined to comment on the suit. So did another Gilman attorney, Robert Goldberg, who is with Biggs and Battaglia, a Delaware law firm.

For its part, Intel promised to fight the suit. "We disagree with the plaintiff in the matter and we are planning a vigorous defense," said Chuck Mulloy, an Intel spokesman

In addition to Otellini, those named in the suit include: former CEO and ex-Chairman of the Board Barrett; directors James Plummer and Susan Decker; and former directors Carol Bartz, D. James Guzy Sr., David Pottruck, Jane Shaw, David Yoffie, Charlene Barshefsky, John Donahoe and Frank Yeary. ""


Source of Post and Article Link
http://www.computerworld.com/
s/article/9141168/Intel_shareholder_wants_execs_to_pay_2.7B_in_fines


Posted here by
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger

More on the Intel Liability with the Iviewit Technologies
Stolen Patent at www.DeniedPatent.com and www.Iviewit.TV

Also Check out www.CEOPaulOtellini.com and www.BruceSewell.com
for Intel Corp's Role in this Massive Shareholder Fraud.
Intel CEO Paul Otellini
Durward Bruce Sewell
Shareholder Activism, Advocate - Shareholder watch

Do the MAJOR Companies,Banks and Judicial Branches monitor the Blogsphere in ANY way?

Do those who monitor High Finance Monitor what Bloggers are Saying? Or is this Blog thing just taken as Whooper Snappers yammering about Nothing that anyone is really paying attention to?

I mean how can Warner Brothers, Intel, Sony and all the companies involved in the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case, How can they ignore all the Documents and all the proof and what do these companies say when the Shareholder says Who is Crystal L. Cox ?

Do they say some disgruntled employee of someone, do they say oh that is just a blog it's not real... and do the Shareholders really believe this... are the Shareholders to simply Believe what paid for controlled Media - Big Media Companies have to say on the Topic and to ignore an Investigative Blogger Such as my self?

The really odd part is the www.Iviewit.TV information has been piling up over 8 years, it is not new information and it is Court Documents, Internal Documents and so much proof that 6 year old could find Convictions Left and Right and See that it is High Time the Inventors and Iviewit Shareholders were due their Rightful Compensation.

The Iviewit Stolen Patent story is not my story, it is just one story our there of many Court Corruption Stories, the thing is when I start to post on a story - I simply want as much information out there as I can find to get the story told. My blog on the iViewit Stolen Patent Story is at http://www.deniedpatent.com/ AGAIN not my story.. just my blog... I had never heard of Iviewit until the beg. of Dec. 2009.

I just don't get why these major companies are not watching BLOGS - for Blogs are TRULY the Real News and No One SHOULD discount them as just a Soapbox of some Yammering Fool...

Does Wachovia or the SBA Care about the Iviewit Stolen Patent Story?

It seems to me that these big companies stand to lose alot, and that you shareholders could lose everything, just in my opinion of Course. So why is no one monitoring the Internet for the Thousands of Documents of Proof on Fraud on the Courts, Fraud againts the USPTO, or what Warner Brothers Inc. is up to ?

Does know one care about the Liability that Intel Corp has created?

Where is the SEC in all this?

It seems to me, and again I surely don't know much about the world of High Finance ... but I do know How to Read and well... the Blatant Corruption, Fraud, Set Ups, Attorney Favoritism, Fraud on the Courts, US Patent Office Fraud, and the amount of money that these guys are covering up illegal activity on ... well it is Shocking.

More on the Iviewit Stolen Technology at
www.Iviewit.TV
and at
www.DeniedPatent.com
crystal cox blog
Posted by Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Whistle Blower