Intel Corporation is a Cartel, Intel has a Monopoly - YOU Lose!! Intel will Do ANYTHING to Keep their Wall of Corruption UP.

"FTC Docket 9288, May 1998.. So How Long has the FTC, SEC, DOJ Protected Intel Corp.?"

Beginning Docket 9288, May 1998..
So How Long has the FTC, SEC, DOJ Protected Intel Corp.?

Over a Decade. And Consumers are Still Paying the Price, Shareholders are Paying for Intel's Crimes and Will SOON pay Billions More.. Tax Payers pay for the Over Looking by Your Governement Agent's of Intel's Crimes..

Prior Reports IGNORED by those Paid to Protect YOU???
when is ENOUGH - Enough with Intel...??

"" Beginning Docket 9288, May 1998, various reports and analysis are submitted by this analyst to FTC now operating in voluntary civic service capacity under Department of Labor Code 3363.5.

Today a decade of analysis delivers tens of
Docket 9341
discovery proofs or pointers to proofs.

Many of which this audience are familiar from prior reports by this analyst submitted to U.S. Senate, Congress, State AGs and U.S. Attorneys.

Under Docket 9341 discovery rules, work from this analyst is passed by FTC Bureau of Competition to Intel for legal rebuttal.

Three Components of Monopoly Recovery

Monopoly recovery is a worldwide financial value having three main components:

1) Consumer recovery is based on the system costs of Intel Inside tied charge back for routing Intel microprocessors across state lines and inter nation boundaries inside a computer chassis.

See prior analyst submissions for specific details covering the illegal aspects of this market rigging rebate fee scheme.

2) Consumer recovery from monopoly price premium associated with some Intel microprocessor and PC product introductions.

3) Industrial harms which include predatory product dumping, Intel selling at a price less then average total cost, measures of variable down to average fixed cost.

Finally, estimation of the marginal cost for Intel to produce a single x86 microprocessor in relation to price sought with variable cost cross check.

Where price is within or lower then average fixed cost, variable or marginal cost, revenues from those quantities are recorded as an industrial monopolization recovery value for FTC discovery.

Consumer Recovery Subset 1; kick back, in violation of Sherman Act Section 1, Section 2, Clayton Act Section 2, 3, 4, 5, 13e, 13c, 13d, Title 48, 1986 anti kickback act

Of the $26.442 billion subset of consumer recovery documented from Intel production estimates (where $42 billion total set is documented by contract), $22.657 billion or 85% is associated with Intel Inside tied charge back sum misrepresented in Intel and PC Dealer financials.

That sum is split between Intel and PC Companies 50:50 for the purpose of this analysis based on the Intel Inside monopoly system metric.

Yet Intel’s portion is known to increase, and PC Companies decrease, over the 15 year duration of this Intel Insider operation.

Intel financials associate Intel Inside as a marketing cost credited to PC Company micro- processor sales. When this commissionable sales value is actually an accrued Dealer rebate passed through Intel as a sales reward for Media Sales Agents taken as their fee, to sustain the supply chain’s product distribution ties between Intel, PC Dealers and Media Agent’s sales channels.

Sales Channels include PC Week, PC Magazine, Computer Shopper, Family Computing, PC World, Windows Magazine, other PC and some general media.

Rebate Values are Sustained from back in time with
forward time purchase agreements.

Production short run to short run, Dealer’s microprocessor purchases are unnaturally weighted to benefit them guiding Media Agents sales preferences.

Intel 1st tier Dealers purchase microprocessors in excess of end demand solely to strip margin values, including consumer transport charge, prior to reselling overage into secondary broker channels.

PC Dealers who are Intel’s 1st tier brokers monopolize majority of Intel margin values, including tied charge back, sustaining their Media Sales Agent artificial attractor and the cross industry distribution tie in total.

This relationship is a financially driven one, planned and implemented for Media Sales Agents to register, meter, report level’s of Intel microprocessor flows through PC dealer channels back to Intel.

That is the nature of the charge back;
for media registering and reporting back channel sales flows
through PC Companies to Intel.

Over time the system evolved into one which accelerated Dealer Product Flows artificially from one Intel product generation to the next, on the weight of Intel kickback placements meant to discharge certain Dealer inventory, to end market buyers, on an Intel time schedule. ""
Source of Post
Document the FTC, DOJ, SEC, State Attorney Generals, FBI and more know of and seem to be ignoring.. Go to www.CEOpaulOtellini.com document at top of blog...

Above Report by Mike Bruzzone
Camp Marketing Consultancy


Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Crystal@CrystalCox.com

Do You Have an Intel Corruption Tip?
Email Me...
Time to Tell the Truth about Intel Corp.
and ALL their "Corrupt Fraternity"..

This is Not Intel Nation
this is "We the People" and Intel Corp.
is Robbing Consumers, Governments and
paying Off everyone who gets in their way...
or Worse... and this is in Many Countries..

www.InvestigativeBlogger.com

Durward Bruce Sewell - Bruce Sewell - D. Bruce Sewell - Bruce Sewell Apple STOLE Iviewit Technology While at Intel and took it to Apple.

Bruce Sewell is a Technology Thief.

I Believe that Bruce Sewell while at Intel Corp, Stole Technology that he then took to to Apple, this is the Iviewit Technology that is Currently on the Apple iPhone.

This Bruce Sewell Stolen Technology has made Billions for Intel and now for Apple. Bruce Sewell is Liable for Massive Shareholder Fraud that he FAILED to Disclose to Intel Corp shareholders that will now be a HUGE multi-billion dollar liability to Apple Shareholders as well...

More on this Stolen Patent - Stolen Technology Story at

www.BruceSewell.com

www.DeniedPatent.com

www.Iviewit.TV


Durward Bruce Sewell - Bruce Sewell - D. Bruce Sewell - Bruce Sewell Apple

OMG - Bruce Sewell the Pompass ASS, Says - "“Other companies must compete with us by inventing their own technologies, not just by stealing ours,”

From the Apple Press Room - Online Of Course.. We have the Double Standards, Flat out Lies and Serious Double Talk from One D. Bruce Sewell General Council to Apple.

I mean this Cannot Really Be CAN IT..?.. Shocking Statement by Now Infamous Double Talker and Patent Infringement Companies BEST BUDDY - Bruce Sewell ...

DurWOOD.. oh I mean DurWard - Bruce Sewell Says THIS...

"“Other companies must compete with us by inventing their own technologies, not just by stealing ours,” said Bruce Sewell, Apple’s General Counsel and senior vice president. " "

OH Yes, there it in Lights. Never Forget this Now Famous Statement that Will End Bruce Sewell's Career as He Once Knew It. Bruce Sewill - the POT Calling the KETTLE Black - per say... as he Smacks down the REAL inventors NOW at his NEW Job at Apple just like he DID at Intel Corp... Now at Intel - CEO Paul Otellini KNEW - we Wonder WHO at APPLE knows the TRUTH about Bruce Sewell and if that is WHY he Was Hired as General Council...

Bruce Sewell knowing Full Well of the Trillion Dollar Patent Theft of the REAL Inventors of the Iviewit Technology - Having FULL knowledge that "other companies" the ONE he was Representing was USING this Stolen Patent and NOT honoring Contract Commitments with the Iviewit Technology Company, and having been Fully Informed of the Importance this Matter was to the Financial Future of the Intel Company and to their Shareholders.... Bruce Sewell withheld this information and Denied the Real Inventors THEIR RIGHTS.

D. Bruce Sewell did this Blatantly, he knew he was above the Law and would never be held accountable for this. For NO ONE would EVER know RIGHT?

Boy if I Was APPLE ... I would Want to Hire the Almighty Bruce Sewell as Well this Way, all those Smart Boys and Girls out there inventing that Really Neat Stuff will have no rights and Get nothing and when they squirm and Fight about it we will just sick Ol' Bruce on Em' - Cuz... Bruce Sewell has Connections in VERY high places, and Bruce Sewell Knows the Ropes when it Comes to SHUTTING up those Pesky inventors, those Patent Owners...

So Again This Statement...

"“Other companies must compete with us by inventing their own technologies, not just by stealing ours,” said Bruce Sewell, Apple’s General Counsel and senior vice president. "

and Oh Believe Me this Will SOON be the Most Highlighted Statement of D. Bruce Sewell's Career... Anyway...

Iviewit Did Invent "their own Technolgy" - D. Bruce Sewell then of Intel as their "General Counsel" Well he was informed of this.

Bruce Sewell knew that the Technology Was STOLEN - and he stood by the Criminals and NOT with the Victims as he Denied the REAL inventors their rights.

And now when the Shoe is on the Other Foot, the Self Righteous Pompass Ass Bruce Sewell says that " "“Other companies must compete with us by inventing their own technologies, not just by stealing ours,” said Bruce Sewell " -

How in the Heck do you COMPETE with a General Counsel from a MAJOR Tech Company when He is Above the Law, knows the Names and Players, has inside information and Stands Seriously on the WRONG side of the MORAL Compass?

You can't win against Liars like Bruce Sewell. He Condones the Stealing of Patents when at Intel and Now is suggesting that Nokai is Falsley Accusing Apple and that Nokai is "stealing ours" - sounds like a School Yard Bully .... but This School Yard Bully Packs a Trillion Dollar Punch and YOU LOSE!!

Here is the Now Infamous APPLE Press Release...


" Apple Countersues Nokia

CUPERTINO, California—December 11, 2009—Responding to a lawsuit brought against the company by Nokia, Apple® today filed a countersuit claiming that Nokia is infringing 13 Apple patents.

“Other companies must compete with us by inventing their own technologies, not just by stealing ours,” said Bruce Sewell, Apple’s General Counsel and senior vice president.

Apple ignited the personal computer revolution in the 1970s with the Apple II and reinvented the personal computer in the 1980s with the Macintosh. Today, Apple continues to lead the industry in innovation with its award-winning computers, OS X operating system and iLife and professional applications.

Apple is also spearheading the digital media revolution with its iPod portable music and video players and iTunes online store, and has entered the mobile phone market with its revolutionary iPhone.

Press Contacts:
Steve Dowling
Apple
dowling@apple.com
(408) 974-1896

NOTE TO EDITORS:
For additional

Source:
Apples Own Press Room...
http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2009/12/11countersue.html
Copy This, Print It Out... Frame It...

Words Durward... YEP thats his Name..
D. Bruce Sewell ..
Words He WILL never Forget Saying.
Bruce Sewell

D. Bruce Sewell - Formerly of Intel - Now General Councel at Apple - Formerly of Perkins Coie and Now Head of the Nokia Smackdown...

Bruce Sewell comes to Apple from Intel in the Fall of 2009

When did Bruce Sewell FIRST know of The Trillion Dollar Stolen Patent and the FACT that Intel was using this patent, this Stolen Technology though Intel was NOT honoring contracts they assumed ?

Well Scour www.DeniedPatent.com for One and Find Emails, Phone Conversations and More that PROVE D. Bruce Sewell not only knew about this Patent Theft, but also Was informed that Intel was using it, was informed of Contracts that Intel was not Honoring and REFUSED to make this right with the Rightful Patent Owners and For Some Reason D. Bruce Sewell and CEO Paul Otellini seemingly FAILED to Disclose this Dirty Little Trillion Dollar Secret To Their Shareholders.

"Before Intel, Sewell worked at Brown & Bain, which became a part of Perkins Coie in 2004, and before that he was an associate at the firm now known as Schnader. "

Now Where Do I Know the Perkins Coie name From? Oh I know their involvement in Corrupting the Bankruptcy Courts in Oregon from my Blog at www.ObsidianFinanceSucks.com

With Perkins Coie in Bruce Sewell's Resume we Begin to See where his Lack of Ethics Comes From. So Check more on the Bio of D. Bruce Sewell at the Link Below..

http://www.iphonejd.com/iphone_jd/2009/09/apple-hires-bruce-sewell-as-new-general-counsel.html
Bruce Sewell, CEO Paul Otellini, D. Bruce Sewell

FEDERAL COMPLAINT SERVICE - Intel Corporation - Bruce Sewell

"From: Eliot I. Bernstein
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 11:23 PM

To: D. Bruce Sewell , Senior Vice President -
General Counsel @ Intel Corporation
Cc: Caroline Prochotska Rogers, Esquire
(caroline@cprogers.com); Marc R. Garber Esq. @ Flaster
Greenberg P.C.; Michele M. Mulrooney Esq. -
Jackoway Tyerman Wertheimer Austen
Mandelbaum & Morris (MMulrooney@JTWAMM.com)

Subject: FEDERAL COMPLAINT SERVICE Docket No. 08-4873-cv FINAL SIGNED BRIEF
PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT BERNSTEIN USCA 2nd Circ 13988ll.pdf - Adobe Acrobat Professional D. Bruce Sewell and Lawrence S. Palley,

Please accept the following as service of my Brief in the USCA 2nd Circ. as INTEL
CORPORATION and Lawrence S. Palley, Director of Business Development are named
Defendants in these matters.

Please report this liability to all proper regulatory agencies,
shareholders, and liability carriers.

Thank you, Eliot Bernstein

From: Eliot I. Bernstein

Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 7:05 PM
To: Deborah Holmes, Deputy Clerk,
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit; Pro Se
Cases @ United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit;
Civil Cases @ United States Court
of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Cc: Caroline Prochotska Rogers, Esquire;
Marc R. Garber Esq. @ Flaster Greenberg P.C.;
Michele M. Mulrooney Esq. -
Jackoway Tyerman Wertheimer Austen Mandelbaum & Morris; 'Andy Dietz';

Subject: Docket No. 08-4873-cv FINAL SIGNED BRIEF PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT BERNSTEIN USCA 2nd Circ 13988ll.pdf - Adobe Acrobat Professional
I-VIEW-IT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Surf with Vision

Dear Deborah,
I have enclosed, per our conversations and your instructions, a PDF copy of my FINAL
SIGNED BRIEF FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT BERNSTEIN USCA 2nd Circ for
Docket No. 08-4873-cv.

I have also sent the document via US Mail as you specified and thus this electronic communication and the mailed copy should constitute a timely filing.

I have attached in the document the following,

1. US Postmaster Certified Letter Receipts showing the same Document as attached herein has been mailed and postmarked with the date Friday, February 27th 2009,

2. A signed Electronic Notification Agreement,

3. A Signed Anti-Virus Certification Form of which a virus check was performed, 4. A Signed Notice of Appearance Form and 5. A Signed Brief.

If you need additional information, please feel free to contact me.

Eliot I. Bernstein
Inventor
Iviewit Technologies, Inc.
www.iviewit.tv

From: Eliot I. Bernstein
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 7:13 PM

To: D. Bruce Sewell, Senior Vice President
- General Counsel @ Intel
Corporation(bruce.sewell@intel.com);

Paul S. Otellini , President and Chief Executive Officer @
Intel Corporation (paul.otellini@intel.com);
Steven R. Rodgers, Vice President and Associate
General Counsel Legal and Corporate Affairs, Director,
Litigation @ Intel Corporation
(steven.rodgers@intel.com)
Cc: Caroline Prochotska Rogers, Esquire
(caroline@cprogers.com); Michele M. Mulrooney Esq. -
Jackoway Tyerman Wertheimer Austen Mandelbaum & Morris (MMulrooney@JTWAMM.com);

Marc R. Garber Esq. @ Flaster Greenberg P.C.; Marc R. Garber Esq. @ Flaster Greenberg P.C.
(marcrgarber@verizon.net); 'Andy Dietz'; 'Barry Becker'; 'krhall007@aol.com'

Subject: INTEL DEFENDANT IN FEDERAL LAWSUIT
Please see the attached Amended Complaint wherein Intel is a Named Defendant in a Trillion Dollar Lawsuit.

Please report this liability to all proper regulatory agencies,
shareholders and liability carriers.

Thank you,
Eliot Bernstein "

Source of This Post
http://iviewit.tv/press/press4.pdf
Bruce Sewell

CEO Paul Otellini is Guilty of SEC Fraud the Way I See it..

CEO Paul Otellini of Intel knew of a Trillion Dollar Liability and REFUSED to tell his Shareholders. Why ? And now as insider Trading News is going around about Intel and IBM, now Paul Otellini says It is news to us... Paul Otellini KEEPS shareholders in the Dark, Does not Honor Contracts with Inventors and STANDS on the Wrong Side of the Moral Compass..

Is all this Not Fraud?

I Guess it is a Matter of Who Ya Know... Boy if I had Intel Stocks I would Sure Be MAD if the Boys in Charge and their Attorney ( Bruce Sewell ) Were .. Well aware of a Trillion Dollar Stolen Patent and were well aware of Contracts they Refused to Make Good on and ... D. Bruce Sewell ... Attorney and CEO Paul Otellini knowing of this HUGE Liability .. and Did they Tell their Shareholders... Is this a Crime? Is it an Ethics Violation? Does it Even Matter at All?

Did Bruce Sewell and CEO Paul Otellini Make any Attempt to Make Good on the Contracts they Assumed... or did they Just Ignore it.. and Now D. Bruce Sewell is at Apple where it Seems he is part of the Fight with Nokio and this Patent Infringment... anyway MUCH More on that Issue and Connected Parties Later...

http://www.iphonejd.com/iphone_jd/2009/09/apple-hires-bruce-sewell-as-new-general-counsel.html

You will NEVER confince me that CEO Paul Otellini is not GUILTY, that he had no INSIDE information on any of this.

Come on Paul Otellini, as we Well Know .. had Knowledge of a Trillion Dollar Patent Theft which affects Stocks NOT ONLY in CEO Paul Otellini's Company but in many SEC Regulated Companies... Trillions of Dollars and ( Silent Fraud ) CEO Paul Otellini Said NOTHING to Shareholders RIGHT? And doesn't this So Called Pillar of the Financial Community owe any Fiduciary Duty to Other Companies, to Shareholders, to Inventors?

CEO Paul Otellini would have us believe he is NOT involved in this Multi-Billion Dollar Scandal....?? Hmmm.. Well I Say CEO Paul Otellini is GUILTY... But hey that is Just My Opinion.

We all Need to Complain to the SEC ON this guy.

Oh Nevermind CEO Paul Otellini and Intel are Above the Law because of Politicians they Know, Political Favors Owed to Them, Billions of Dollars and Corruption Beyond the Comprehension of Folks who have Morals.

Does the ITC (International Trade Commission) Really Care about Patent Infringement and the True Rights of Inventors, My Guess is AGAIN it is a matter of Who your Connected to, How Much Money the Bad Guys Have and Who is Above the Law, Ethics and Morals of Any Kind.


Why are Lengthy Court Battles Needed in Fights Such as Iviewit Getting their Patent, or in Nokai Getting Their Rights Honored against APPLE?

I mean It should take a Week, may be a month to Read the Patents and to see if they have been used by APPLE and do the right thing.


However, Keeping Nokai, Iviewit and REAL patent owners such as them in Court for years well this keeps Stock Prices Stable as the Decision is Pending and Meanwhile Guys like CEO Paul Otellini, the Apple Owners, Intel Corporation, Warner, Sony, MPEGLA - well they can lie about all this so Shareholders won't panic.

Though the Proof is Right there, if the Courts can be bought off in some way or some how manipulated well then it can drag on for years, GET those Attorneys Plenty of Money and NOT create a Panic in the Stock Market with the TRUTH that there is Trillions in Liability that Have not Been Reported on the Books.


Related Documents and Links...


http://www.pbs.org/nbr/site/onair/transcripts/intel_ceo_paul_otellini_on_galleon_group_091019/


http://www.deniedpatent.com/2009/12/intel-ibm-lockheed-sgi-in-trillion.html


http://www.deniedpatent.com/2009/12/intel-ibm-lockheed-sgi-in-trillion.html


http://www.deniedpatent.com/2009/12/federal-complaint-service-intel.html


http://www.deniedpatent.com/2009/12/to-paul-s-otellini-president-and-chief.html

Insider Trading News Links ( Again Print or Copy to your Computer - as Links and Information Disappear once the BOUGHT Media see the Dots Being Connected by Obnoxious Bloggers.

http://news.cnet.com/8301-13924_3-10377395-64.html

http://sanfrancisco.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/stories/2009/10/26/daily153.html

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2001/12/11/intel_insider_trader_fined/

More on What CEO Paul Otellini and D. Bruce Sewell ( Now a Liability at APPLE) - More on What they Knew and did not Disclose to Shareholders COMING SOON.... Oh and Don't Think that IBM and Intel Were NOT Talking on this Trillion DOLLAR Patent Theft that WOULD affect both their Stock Prices.


Crystal@CrystalCox.com


Crystal